'This Will Haunt Them': Pakistan Backs Mohsin Naqvi in Asia Cup Trophy Storm
The Asia Cup 2025 trophy controversy has ignited a firestorm—yet within Pakistan, a strong narrative has emerged in defense of Mohsin Naqvi. From former cricketers to political commentators, his critics are met with statements of national pride, legal right, and rightful defiance.
The Defenders Speak Out
Pakistan’s public figures, ex-cricketers, and media personalities have come forward to support Naqvi’s audacious move. Figures like Shoaib Malik, Basit Ali, and even government-aligned journalists have framed his action as a stand against disrespect, not theft.
I told Mohsin Naqvi not to hand the trophy to India. They may be the No.1 team, but their actions were third-rate...
— Basit Ali, Former Cricketer
This will haunt them — India will regret refusing to accept the Asia Cup trophy from Mohsin Naqvi.......
— Basit Ali, Former Cricketer
I never apologised to the BCCI. I’m ready to hand over the trophy whenever they want — the trophy belongs to the winners...
— Mohsin Naqvi, PCB Chaiman
His defenders argue that Naqvi was safeguarding the symbol of Pakistani pride and refusing a “flawed” presentation.
Legal & Symbolic Justifications
One recurring defense: the trophy is not legally handed over until the ceremony protocol is followed.
Supporters argue Naqvi merely delayed the formal presentation, not withheld it permanently.
Others connect it to national sentiment, saying the action resonated with Pakistanis who felt slighted by how the event was handled.
Mohsin Naqvi - Political Backing & National Pride
Beyond cricket, Naqvi has been defended by commentators and parts of the state media. Supporters are calling for his “honour” — and in some reports, he’s slated to receive a national medal in recognition of his defiance. Some even frame the controversy as a symbolic resistance, saying sports should not be dictated by political or foreign pressures.
Dissent from Within
Defense for Mohsin Naqvi’s deeds is not unanimous. Voices like Shahid Afridi have cautioned against mixing politics with cricket, warning that such stunts damage Pakistan’s image internationally. Watch one of his earlier mentions about Naqvi.
The
Critics in the media have also cautioned that defending random controversial acts can set dangerous precedents.
In Pakistan, the narrative is shifting — what many see as trophy “theft,” others call a patriotic stand. Whether one agrees or not, the fervor in defense of Naqvi underscores how sports and identity interweave tightly in the subcontinent.
What’s your take? Do you think his defense is valid — or does defiance cross a line? Share your thoughts via #NaqviDefended #AsiaCup2025.
